The New World Order is an ancient pyramid structure. This organization is closely linked to the racist philosophy of Nazism. The idea of massive population reduction by war, famine, disease, AIDS (biogenetic weapon) … but with Eugenics, Sterilization, Euthanasia of patients with mental disorders … once practiced by psychiatrists as Kallman, Mengele … the Rockefeller-Rudin Institute during the Second World War. Far from over, nowadays, at the genetic science, major laboratories currently require easing « ethical rules » … In addition to this link Nazism, the New World Order try to perform certain biblical prophecies: a single language on the Tower of Babel, the antichrist, the mark of the beast, Babylon … for world domination. But for the advent of a false « religion, » astro-theological type, but that would be really a Satanist ideology. This, added to a world government, a global law, global justice, global education, world police … Similarly, this configuration would aim to destroy all forms of spirituality and unity, which Islam could to be the symbol …
Thus, the New World Order is a « Americanization » of the world and a genuine transition of humanity. Towards globalization and economic deregulation, social, psychological, cultural … In this chaos, the United States would be the « New Atlantis » … Steeped in a utopia, which can be summarized by the phrase « e pluribus unum » of many nations Unity. In fact, this system would be the result of a « Conflict Dialectic » that opposes the « thesis » (capitalism of the United States) and « antithesis » (communism) which now add up to the » synthesis « (New World Order). Turning our eyes to reality with a multitude of masks, different covers that hide the same face, in reality, we would be faced with a multitude of conspiracy. Or people, a minority, entities, an elite manipulated occult groups (something beyond all of us) or not: illuminati, freemason, druid … plotting « something » in secret. That, for the New World Order, which would the planners. We often equate to a crime syndicate, an association of bankers who have planned the history of the world revolution, world war, fall of the Berlin Wall crisis … Those there, would claim the same as « Kings » or » demigods « … We also criminalizes the secret services (CIA …), multinational, military lobbies, industrial … In addition, since 1833, aristocratic families control well and truly Earth: Rockefeller (Standard Oil Corp. today Exxon), Harriman (railway), Weyerhaeuser, Sloane, Pillsbury, Davison, Payne, Gilman, Taft, Stimsom, Perkins, Whitney, Bundy, Lord, Heinz, Bush … In the brains of the New World Order, we find: CFR, the Ditchley Foundation, the Bilderberg group, Skull & Bones, Bohemian Club, the Vatican and the order of Jesuits, PNAC, the Trilateral Commission, the UN and its military arm of NATO: world government established by the Rockefeller Foundation. All these groups hold the press, information, education, banks, oil, weapons of mass destruction … So the current policy would only lies and demagoguery. With media day that minimize the true cause of conflict in speaking of ethnic war, religious, revolution … In this optical illusion, those who challenge official truths are considered conspiracy, anti-American, anti-Semitic … Compared the Vatican and the Jesuits: Founded in 1541 by Ignatius Loyola, we owe « the Inquisition » responsible for murder, torture, war, genocide of millions of innocent … for heresy. That would be the Jesuits, the true « spiritual controllers » NOM, in agreement with a future global conflict between America, the Middle East and Israel in case … About the Bilderberg Group, since 1954, a secret meeting was held every year with about 200 people from around the world, the elite of the financial system, economy, industry, politics, media, scientific, academic … No information (subject matter …) is given to the public. This, again a week before the G8 meeting. Where is the democracy? Worldwide, the NAME would control the world and nations with money (currency, currency issue …) with private banks, leading to deprivation of property of persons by inflation and deflation. Thus, the NAME planning: an imbalance, a rarity, a violence, a broken free … structurally (organized) as we live on a planet of abundance or common happiness is theoretically possible. Despite this, resources (mineral, hydrocarbon, gas …), wealth, men (central city) … are now captured for private interests. Geopolitically seen with the seizure of oil supplies (Caspian Sea …) in the United States. Still on the NOM include its main pillars: work, neoliberalism, money, military, materialism, ultra safe … As to security, it is about creating a » martial law « on the planet (surveillance, flicage …). In the book 1984 by George Orwell, the author discusses the threat and the illusion of an endless war (war against terrorism), to justify increasing social control, as well as state repression. In this logic, there is also the NSA and its satellites (Mercury, Mentor, Trompet), which intercept and filter radio communications (radio, television, mobile phone, microwave …). This is even specialized in computer science and cryptology … with computers with Artificial Intelligence, spies satellites, planetary listening systems, the Echelon network … And soon microchips (micro chip) connected to a super computer. Even in this idea of social penalization, conversely, an economic decriminalization looming, and will greatly benefit the elite. Internationally, a sophisticated system of plunder has forced more than 90 countries to accept programs of « structural adjustment » (loans from the IMF) since the 1980s, has the effect of broadening the difference between rich and poor. In addition, the « square » dominating the WTO (the United States, Europe, Canada and Japan), and the American triumvirate (World Bank, IMF and the US Treasury) hijack countries developing. For those, have unpayable debt that forces them to pay millions to Western every day. The result is an elite controls 80% of global wealth.
Finally, the key to democracy would be in control of the currency (money) by the people, not by an elite, because in this case, we would all slaves. Then that support the NAME? Well, it provides strategic support for Israel and Zionism, atheism, the derived religions of Christianity, multinational, official theses of September 11, 2001, nuclear, official organizations (associations subsidized) to rich and powerful, the police and the secret services, on television, in the press and mass media, competition and selection, the petrochemical and pharmaceutical industry, GMOs and Biotechnology, in individualism, professional sport, strength and action, the right of interference (Humanitarian), anti-terrorism laws.
Finally, we can now address the mostprominentsymbols of thisnew vision of theworld which is theNAME, we find: the owlof theBohemian Club, the eye: taken from Egyptian mythologywhichrepresentthe eyeofHorus,which would be thatof Lucifer,sometimes described asa reptilianeye ofSatan.But asthe eye of theDajjal« the Antichrist » according to Hadith. Therewas alsothe pyramid(at the forefront of enlightenedeliteand basemade ofidenticalbrick, the people), the equilateral triangle, the figure 3, the666,the American Eagle(which is actually thephoenix risingalwaysfrom the ashes). We must notunderestimate thepower of symbols(movie,TV …), because they can act asa real « coup » in the human unconscious…
You certainlyhave heard ofthe latestNASA studyonthe collapseof our civilization. In this study,we haveat besta fewdecadesbefore disappearingfrom the face ofthe Earth.Beyondalarmismalsoprominently displayedin this study thatin its conclusions,the whole of humanityfaceschallengesof historic proportions. It seemedinteresting to tryto return to thisstudy thatunleashednumerouscommentson social networksandinmy email!!So let’s trytosee more clearly, and analyzethe subjectaway frompanicand takinga step back.
What is theposition takenby the studyof NASA?
Clarification,please find attachedthe link toaccess theoriginalyou isto say,the full document, in English and27pages!
We can summarizeby saying thatthe studypoints to thethreat ofdepletion of naturalresources and the distributionof resources.
The researchers useda mathematicalmodel calledHandy(HumanNatureandDynamical) andlistedthe reasons thatled to the fallof other civilizations: the Mayans, theMesopotamianempire,the Roman Empire,the Han Dynasty,etc.By studyingthe dynamicsbetween man and nature, the study shows that there is arecurring cyclefoundthroughouthistory andthat causesa « sudden collapse » of civilizations.
Among therecurringcollapsecausesinclude: –Climate; –Demography; –Water, agriculture; –Energy.
When it occurs, the convergence of thesefactorsresults ina civilizationalcollapse.
« For the authors, it would be wrongto believethat technological advanceswill solvethese problemsbefore it istoo late, becausetheylead tohigher consumption. Onesolutionproposedbythis study: the establishmentof appropriate policiesthatwould aim toreduce inequalities andresource consumption. «
Clearly,thisNASA studyactuallyadvocatesthe establishmentofsystematic policiesof« decay »to save humanity.
The collapseof complex societiesof ProfessorTainter
Thisis an excellent book. I enclosean annexagainthe link toreadorreread itin its entiretyyou. To summarizeagain,for thisAmerican professorwho has studiedcarefullythe collapsesof companiesin our historythe factors that leadto the tragedyare:
3 /The increased complexitycarries with itincreasedcostsforresidents.
4 /Investment insociopoliticalcomplexityas a responseto the resolution ofproblems, oftenreached a point ofdiminishing returns.
5 /As themarginalreturn on investmentincomplexitydeclines, the company continues to investmoreheavily inproportionally lessprofitablestrategy.It is then necessaryto deal withoutbreaks oftensionout of the currentoperating budget.
6 /diminishing marginal returnsmakecomplexityan overall strategylessattractive, so that parts ofa societyperceivea growingpoliticalseparation ordisintegrationadvantage.Logically,various segments of thepopulationincrease theiractiveorpassive resistance, oropenlyattemptto secede.
Compared tothis reading, it is clearthat a country likeFrancegetsalmostfaultlesslycriteriaof collapse.Like whatwe can befirstsomewhereand with ease.Tax exilesorour compatriots whoare simplychoosing andthey areincreasinglylikely totry theirluck abroad, are nothing elsethan « segments of the populationthat increase theiractiveresistance ».
We financeourcomplexitybyincreasingtaxesalwaysmore things likeelectronic cigarettes, drinks,and creativity ofour elitesisthe matter withoutlimit. « Clashofsimplification » launched by our presidentis an oldsnakeWedEveryonewants to simplify thecomplexity, orthe complexityispacked,itescapes us,we runbehind her.Wesuffer. Oncelaunched, the shock of simplificationwas soonforgotten, andfrankly,among you …whostill remembersabout itwhile he wasthe« one »of our mediathereless than a year.
The Club of RomeandDennisMeadows
DennisMeadowsis one of theauthors of thevisionarystudy« The LimitstoGrowth »which,in 1972, warned aboutthe risk of acrisisof collapsein the firsthalf of the 21stcenturycausedby the depletion ofresources of the planet. That makes40 yearsthat some havealready sounded thealarm aboutthe unsustainabilityof our economicmodel based onthe idea that « infinite growth ofmass consumptionin a finite world. »
Now it isno need foranymathematical model tounderstand whatcommon senseallowsa childto understand. The infinitegrowthin a finite worldis an intellectualaberrationin itself.Butoursystem iscurrentlyon theabsurdpremise. Topass it, itwould takeus tosuchaccess to otherplanets andwe canobviouslyexploitmassively. This again isillusoryasthe costs andtechnologiesto achieve thisweare missing.
Let’s be realistic. This isnotto send ateam of bravemodernadventurersto Marsfor a few monthsand4!This wouldcolonize, to live, operate and repatriateresources onEarth.We shouldbuildcargospaceinstead ofourcontainer. Weobviouslyarenotand we risk, as thereis the problem,never reachthepointwhere we will betechnicallyable to goeasily exploitanother planetand knowourcollapsebefore.
DennisMeadowsis notanyonesince he was thedirector ofMIT, a very famousuniversity,and his1972 studydescribed severalscenariosofpossible developments inthe economy, population and global resources, eachscenario corresponding todifferent choicesthat humanity couldcollectivelymake fromtheir1972screenplay« Itis business as usual« , which roughly correspondsto whathappenedthereafter,predicted thatthe approachlimitsthe planetwould begin toexert a strongimpact on growthfromaround2010,which wouldthenimpactincreasing, eventually leadby 2050at the latesttocollapse, that is to say, aprecipitous declinein living standardsandperhapsthe world’s populationin a state ofexhaustionof resources andthe natural environment.
For those whowish to explorethis subject(and Irecommendthem), you will find thelink to the latestinterviewgiven byMr.Meadowsand French inthe text!
Now that wehave seen throughthe work ofthreedifferent people or groupsthat the idea ofacollapse wasnot nearly asunlikely,ask the questionthat reallymad!
Western civilizationisshenowseriously threatenedwith extinction?
I would rather talkabout a possibleloss ofcivilization aswe know it inthe sense that thedisintegration ofWestern structuresdoes not mean theywill be replacedby a new« darkage. »The currenteconomic crisis canbe consideredas suchin two ways:itcould be an elementdirectlytriggerourpotential fallor aprecursorelement throughthe tensions itcangeneratein the coming years, in this case it would meanin reality, the collapse has already begun.
TheNASA reportisalsoreflected, as we have seen inotherstudies, particularly thoseof the Club ofRomewhich hadanalyzed froman environmentalangleofthefarmcommodity cycles. Itwas thusconcludedthat economic growthwould eventuallysee alogical endfacing thelimits ofavailable resources ina system ofmass consumption,the basic ideacan besummarized by« infinite growth in a finite worldisdefinitionimpossible. « The otherpoint of referencein this regard isthat of theAmericanJosephTainter(The collapse of complex societies) under a more politicaland historical analysisofthe lategreat civilizations.
This leads usto wonderifindeedthesystem as we know, based on consumptionandmass productioncantakeforeverresting onthe fullabundanceof raw materialsand energy, all of which shouldbeavailable at avery low cost!
LikeNASAand the Clubof Rome, Iam among thosewho thinkthat such structuresmaynot last,especially in aglobalized worldlike ours.Once thatissaid,we should notsaythat our situation ishopelessso far: it’s notbecause oursystem can notmakemass consumptionits cornerstonethat civilizationitselfis doomedto collapse.Itshould not be confusedas suchpureeconomic system(and its corollary politics) of a civilizationas a whole:the recent fallof the Soviet systemis there to remindthe importance of suchnuances.The endof an economic systemis notthe endof a culturemuch less theend of a civilization, however it can alsobe one!
The complexityweakensa companymakingsensitiveto the slightest change
It is clear thattheunderstanding and predictionof the environmentisincreasinglydifficult.Taintergives the impression, quitepragmatically from therest, a companyweakensgraduallyas it becomesmore powerful, andmore complex.
For example,there arenot20years ago, it was possible for just aboutanyoneto repair theheadlightof his car, a simple bulb changeis necessaryto get there.Today,thisproblem asksto go tothe dealership,to use specialtoolsto disassemblehalfof the bumper, and buy a special bulbwhose price is10times larger.
In the same vein, the proliferation of electronic equipment forour carsmore sourcesof failures,andthesefailuresare nowimpossible, almost, to repairfor the average person. Lessautonomous, we eventuallydepend on whatwe call« services-support » (water supply, energy,food, clothingby externalservices …).Moreover, theseservicesare becoming popularmore theyweakenby definitionan overall balancegeneralizinginterdependence.
Thus, during thesnowstormsofearly2013,the government had beenforced tostoptrailersat the entrance oftheIle-de-France, which hadended up creatingshortages in severalsectorsaftera few days.In asimilar register, the impact of the tsunami thathit Japan inMarch 2011 ontheJapanese companieshadended up creatingsupply problemsaroundthe globe.In other words, the more we develop specificsystems, we arelessable to adaptto unforeseen events.
Theissue of complexityis alsoparticularly worryingthat it isso muchmorelimited in spacein the eraof globalization.The problemis that it isimpossible oralmost« simplify »asystem too complex, and the example of the « clashofsimplification »desired by theDutchgovernmenthereisquite revealingas heindeedcreated newlaws thataddedtothe complexity of thefrenchState.Finally,in a complex society, individuals are highly specializedandnotby definitionmasterthe skillsnecessary forsurvivalin a worldmore« natural. »Thereforea complex societymakes peopleless resilientasdependent on otherswho haveother skills.The complexitythusmakes each of usmore sensitive anddelicateto the vagariesof the world.
One factormaylead to a collapse! …Though!
Our companiesareboth complexand therefore fragilebutup to a pointthis complexityand this « technicality » possible to findsolutions andworkarounds.A complex societyisa certainadaptableway. This iswhy, apart from a totallyextremehazards,the collapse of acivilizationis alwaysmultifactorialand itis theconvergenceof economic,social, political, orculturalenergy.
So some people thinkthat a majorenergy crisiswould not beable to conductour industrial societiestocollapse. While this may seemlogicalif we assumethat the fallsof civilizationsare multifactorial, it is nevertheless forget too quicklyhowour wholelifenow dependsoil andits derivatives.We areat the endof the age ofabundantand cheapoiland the problem isalso notto know when tosinkthe lastdrop of oilthe last wellthathow muchwill costthe barrelswhen theytrulyrare.Our medicines,our medicine, our clothing,our food,ourfertilizer, our furniture, everything, absolutely everythingnow depends onthe availabilityof fossilenergy.No civilizationin historyhasnever been sodependent onenergyfairyand mostenergytodayis oil. We are unableat this time toconduct whatis called thetransition to cleanenergyorrenewable energy.
So I thinkfor the first timein our history,one factor,andwe will consolidateallunder the term « raw material »can lead to acollapse ofsocieties as weknow them soitessential to oureconomic systemis missingblood.Now,and allthe figuresclearly show, they are running out.
To goa little furtherin the reasoning, the Roman Empire had nopower sourceother thanthe armsof slaves.Its collapsewas thereforeactuallymultifactorial. The same phenomenaare more or lessrepeateduntil the emergenceof our civilizationthatwe can call« Industrial ». Without energywe are doomed toa very short timeandthisiswhat explains, do not be naive, the need to intervenein Iraq, Libya, Syria, or Ukraine.All countriesof the world areengaged in a« softwar »to raw materials.Whenreallymissthose« softwar » could becomefar moredangerous.
So obviously, you want stillhopeandthat therealwayshas solutions.
These mechanismscollapsesare theyirreversible andcan we havesome hope?
The besthistorical exampleto me isthehistory of humanity, the latter punctuated bymajor shocksandreadjustmentsoften surprising.
Contraryto popular belief, thefall of the RomanEmpiredid not meanthe end of allcivilization and alltechnique,although thisobviouslyrepresenteda« regression ». Nevertheless, the following civilizationsalways manage toovercomethe technological and economicthreshold forthat preceded them. At leastthisisthecase in the historyof the West.
The problemis to askwhat mightreplace theglobalized societyat a time whennocons–model exists toreplace them,whichin itself issomethingtotally newhistorically.
A collapseof this systemwhere everyone isinterdependentwilllogicallygloballyand nothing willcomeinplacealternative.
When a systemcollapsesonce, he always had the ability to beabsorbedby a more powerfulneighbor(it wasthe case ofRomewiththe military power ofthe Germanic tribesand intellectualmatrixof Christianity), which is actuallyunthinkablein the current stateof things.
Whatcould leadtoacollapse of oursocial models? Should we gotofeara new MiddleAges?
As I saidearlier,we canseparate theend of apolitico-economic system of the end of a civilization, to which we can add athird scenario,far moreapocalyptic, namely the end of humanity.
Most disturbingisthat this pattern, as spectacularas it is,is notentirelyruled out.
Beyondtheglobalizedaspect of oursystem, further weaknessisto considertoday:our incrediblepotential for technologicaldestruction.
When the RomanEmpire collapsed, there was nolaboratoryP4focusingmasses ofdeadly viruses, or nuclearpower plants, let alone nucleararsenalscapable ofvitrifiedhundred timesthe entire planet.
Orone can legitimatelywonder whatwould happen ifever thesestructureswere no longer managedby competent staff. Moreover, thisissue ofpotentialtechnologicaldestructionwas a realproblemduring the collapseof the SovietUnion withanuclear warheadobsessionis foundsoldon the black marketby militarywhose balanceswere notpaidsinceseveral years…!!
If wecan always hopethat the capitalist system, in itsnarrowestacceptance(respect for private means of productionin theproperty)can rely onhis incredibleability to adaptto findnew lifeand newoperatingassumptions(likethe circular economyfor example), black scenariosare thereforeclearlynot be excluded.This brings usto thegroundbreaking bookby NassimTaleb, TheBlackSwan, forwhichitshapes ourhistoryis not the« average normal events » … but the extremeand highlyimprobable events.
The collapseisinevitable, then,?
The answerwill not likeyou becauseyou do not likebad news, but yes, the collapse of civilization aswe know itis only a matterof time andeven ifthese subjectsbecause they areparticularlyanxietyare not publiclydetailed, allthose who thinkita bitseriouslycome to the sameconclusion.
The growthof the world populationis exponential, but our resourcesare not. The problem canbe summed upfairly simply. Or we findmore resources andIcan guarantee you thatit’s noton Earthaswe find them, or we reduce our consumptionofresources, orwe reduce ourpopulationsodemand.
Sothere are threeparameters andnot one morethat you canplay. There isthisproblemthreevariablesand they are perfectlywell known.
More resources. Less consumptionofresources Lessresource-intensive.
Formore resourcesshould beas in thediscovery of America, and it was aconsiderablecontribution innew wealth andresources toold Europe,we leftthis time notourcontinentto discovera new one,butwe were going tooperateon another planet.Mustwe dobeforewecollapsewhich obviouslylooks verybad start.
We candrastically reduceour consumptionandthisis whathappens withunemployed workers and« poor »aremillionstobediminishingbynecessity, notby choice.We can go backto amuch simplerway oflife, leave the citiesandmove closer tothe earth.Cities arean aberrationin terms ofcityresourcessincebydefinition mustdo everythingtobringdepends on allservicesandsupports. He has noautonomy as possible.It can notgroworraise chickensorrabbitsitselfhoused ina hutchoverpriced.Ihope we canadapttothat waybecause if wedo not do thatthenthere will only bethe last variable.
Reducethe human population…it can be doneby disease, war or famine.Choose yourendoryour hungerbutin any casethis option isvery unpleasant.
How to prepare?
AgainI pointyoulinkan articleI wroteabout itrecently, entitled « How to prepare for the economic collapse. »
Please notethat accessto raw materialsproblems, which we arealready experiencing, are above alleconomic problems.Remember that beforethe subprime crisisin 2007,we wereallglued tothe priceof oileyeswhich exceeded$ 150 a barrel!!Whyin your opinion?Just becausethere wasenoughoilto supplypower to aworldineconomic growth.
This means thatgrowth will notreturnCANunlikeanything weexplainourgoonsleadersfor the simplereason thatif we hadafuturestrong global economicgrowth, whilethecommodity pricesflamberaitand thatbrand, thevery high pricesof raw materialswould« break » theeconomic growth andrecoverywould be strong. It is essential tounderstand this mechanism. Everyonehas forgottenorobscured, butfrom 2005 to 2007yetwe‘ve all been there andwe were able tomeasure the effect ofresource scarcity. While the economyis in troublearound the world, the price of oilis now10times higher thanduring the firstGulf War!!!
So be awarethat no matter whatthey tell you, there will beno returnto strong andsustainable economic growth.We arealreadybackinthe era ofscarcityandbefore the time ofthe collapse.
Thenstorewhichwill come in handy, have tools andnot « made in china », have plenty to keepwaiting for yourfirst harvest, learn to grow, sewing, repairing,horseback riding,hunting,trapping, learn tocope andto becomeas independent aspossible, and particularlyif you canleave the citiesbecause in case ofcollapse of civilizationcitieswill offer nochance of survivalin the long runand it is exactlythatitis happening in Greece. In Greece,it is a trueurban migrationtaking place. 60% of Greeks want to joincitiesthe countryside,pastboardshelloto tackleurban poverty.
Whilesomewill saybut it’s muchtoo pessimisticasanalysis oras an approach! Except thatmy dear friends,the crisis beganin the summer of2007!There arealmost 7 years!!We arewaitingfor 7full yearsthe returnto growththatwe are promisedto eachpresidentialgreetingseason!!!7 yearswaitingtocomesee nothingexceptmore miseryandmore poverty,moredamageto ourway of life,more taxes andless wealth…This movementis not just aboutour country.It is global.
Soafter 7years of waiting, do not you thinkthatthe right questionis notrather to askand ifthe collapsehad already begun? And ifthe collapsewas not « brutal » as indicated byNASA, butjustrelativelyslow?Andin your opinion,howthe RomanEmpirewas itcollapsed? April 16,3:23 p.m.at376? Inreality,NASAledusallastrayin this case, the collapse of a civilization,because it hasstructures, rules, laws, official bodies, culture, technique, etc.because shealwayshas aformof strength andresilience thatexplainedits success anddevelopmentneversuddenly collapses. At first itis a slowdecay, almostimpalpableoris confusedwithtemporary crisisterminal crisisandthe eventsgraduallyaccelerate,and finallythe last stage, when reachingcertain « threshold effects » that is tosay, asufficient accumulationofproblems, sothe endof the fall isbrutal.
The collapsehas already begun.It is economical,technological, environmental, social, political andmoralcourse. This isnot the endof the world butthe endof a system,andone in whichwe all livetoday.
Re-write history by following the hypocrite money trail
World War II , an American crusade for freedom and democracy ?
The winners write history, this is the version that is taught since 1945 on both sides of the Atlantic.
While we prepare to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the capitulation, it is important to reveal the myth of « liberation. »
In the United States , Hitler very long been considered an excellent business partner, but in a war that does not go as planned, then eventually alliances form against the » worst enemies » with « bad allies » …
The Normandy landings occurs only very late, June 6, 1944 , will nevertheless of the second world war a tremendous financial windfall for the United States.
Releasing a portion of the fascist Europe to « dominate » economically , all the conditions are met in 1945 to begin a long Cold War …
Also take the time to examine the major players in the financial involvement of American capitalists in the manufacture of the Second World War.
Misrepresentation of historical facts
Like any historical narrative, the official version of the Second World War has a partially fictional character. The work of the historian, who is perpetually revise history, nuance and complexity came the official version written by the victors.
The official version of the Second World War offers essentialized antagonism between two geopolitical blocs to completely independent reasons: on the one hand, good, defending democracy, and on the other, the wicked, supporters of the dictatorship. If the Communists, who have changed along the way, overall the exception was irreconcilable and never communicated other than in the conflict enemies blocks. However, evidence of collusion between officials multiple enemies come as soon as we look closely at the facts.
The links between Nazism and transnational industrial capitalism , including American , are well documented ( General Motors Operation Paperclip , etc. . ) . However, less is known about the links between Nazism and financial capitalism , the famous » cosmopolitan bankers ‘ against which the Nazis themselves yet cried so hard . The name of Warburg sometimes appears . But as shown by the research of Anthony Sutton , a Eustace Mullins or nickname Sydney Warburg, the relationship between the Third Reich and Wall Street or the City were even more intimate and intriquants . Even at the height of the war , Nazi Germany was never excluded from the international financial system of the time (transactions, speculation , etc. . ) .
The major international bank , whatever its religious origin, has never declared war on Hitler, except at the margins . On the contrary even , as to arrive at supreme power in Germany in the 1930s , moreover through legal channels , it was necessary , as now , the support of banks and media … But beyond even the obvious connivance from private actors , it seems there has been further complicity at the highest level between States officially at war against each other, namely between the German government, a hand, and the allied British and American governments on the other.
In support of this thesis, we propose the reader documents that may well contribute to undermine completely the history of the Second World War, and thus the history of the world . The Bibliothèque nationale de France offers online internet digital versions of some of its archives , including the underground press circulating in the mantle France during the German occupation. We reproduce below some excerpts and links to full articles, which can also be found in the catalog rating : RES -G- 1470 ( 402).
« The Truth »(La Vérité) , No. 55 , December 10, 1943 .
« Why the Front does not move in the Mediterranean. « » The New Leader, member of the British Independent Labour Party , denounced the gold business of British capitalism in favor of the war. » The longer it lasts , the better » is the spirit of the Exchange. Banks establish branches behind not soldiers . (…) Dividends are up 88% ! After that we understand why , when Churchill spoke of « a terrible year in 1944 , » shares rise, while the military commentator Lidell Hart is surprised that the British army could not advance in southern Italy » at 5 German divisions » . Germans trumpeting the exploits of their army when it is mostly organized passivity allied governments. «
« Those who shaved Nantes refuel gasoline in Germany ! » » Readers we shall send a recent » Note from the governing bodies of the Secret Army in Allied Command » . (…) » IN NO EVENT ALLIED AVIATION HAS BOMBED BASIN BRIEY OR bauxite mines SOUTHEAST , big industry where the enemy gets most of its resources. » The note continues: » INFORMATION WE ABSOLUTELY SAFE ARRIVAL UNINTERRUPTED POST BY SPAIN TRAIN FULL TANK OF FUEL . » (…) «
« The Truth » (La Vérité), No. 56 , January 15, 1944 .
« A war of capitalist pirates … Roosevelt refueling Hitler … » » In its latest issue , The Truth unveiled traffic gasoline and aircraft between » Allies » and Germany. (…) Everywhere it is the conspiracy of silence. (…) Workers must ignore the financial dealings do not care about » national borders » and so-called » ideological frontiers » . (…) The Truth intends to break the public silence of the bourgeois press , as a pro – Nazi ally. Each worker must recognize the mask ripped off, the true face of imperialist belligerents nowhere Crusaders civilization and peace. But capitalist pirates who kill each people to share markets and that , even during the war, them continue their successful business . «
« The Truth » (La Vérité) , No. 58 , February 10, 1944 .
« The trafficking of gasoline. Capitalist International is not dissolved . » » 1939. War is coming … and the traffic continued . In all countries , liars newspapers spoke of the blockade, but the Allied ships carrying ore and American equipment in Germany via Belgium . (…) Today , the Allied air forces destroy some industries in Germany in order to remove a competitor in the future. But that in the immediate future, the Reich can take the time it takes before the USSR ‘s allies ship every day two gasoline Hitler trains , a hundred cars passing each day in Port Bou . «
« The Truth » (La Vérité) , No. 59, February 17, 1944 .
» After oil , minerals ! » » Comrades returning from Germany asked us : » Why the big German chemical plants are not they bombed While 150,000 workers , women and children were charred Hamburg , why plants THE LEUNA by example, are they still standing ? » We are now able to give the answer. Is that GERMAN CHEMICALS ARE REDEEMED minerals AMERICAN SPECIAL Reich whose needs for its war industry PRODUCTS . «
You should know Henry Ford, as Prescott Bush , was part of the Board of BBH (Brown Brothers Harriman , which claimed to be the largest private investment bank in the world ) . Throughout the ’30s , there was nothing illegal in doing business with Thyssen and many American companies , among the best known , had invested heavily in the German economic recovery. However, everything changed after Germany invaded Poland in 1939. Even then , it could be argued that BBH was within its rights continuing business relations with Thyssen , until the end of 1941 , as the U.S. was still technically neutral , at least until the attack on Pearl Harbor.
For decades , rumors linking large American families (Bush , Ford, Kennedy, Rockefeller , etc …)
the Nazi war machine have circulated . There is little time , the British newspaper The Guardian gave the results of a very thorough about these » very special » relationships or American capitalists investigation blithely traded with the Nazis while young Americans were being killed in the name of freedom in Europe , while their government cynically trampled the application of the » Trading with the enemy Act » ( the law prohibiting trade with the enemy ) .
A trial was held in 2001 in the USA, involving, among others, Ford and Bush families , The trial revolves around an execution order , passed January 22, 1944 and signed by President Franklin Roosevelt, who asked the Government to take all measures to save European Jews . The lawyers contend that the order was ignored because of pressure from a group of big American companies, including BBH , where Prescott Bush was a director … but some U.S. manufacturers continued to work with the same Reich after 1941 ……… ……….. or of the trial.
The relationship between Ford and the Nazis , historian Miriam Kleinman writes: » When you think of Ford, you think of baseball or donuts You do not think the portrait of Henry Ford Hitler had hung in his office. « . In fact, the relationship between Henry Ford and the German dictator predate the seizure of power by the Nazis in 1933 . Among the anti- Semitic Henry Ford distinguished himself by publishing many slanders against the Jewish people in a journal that belonged to him . So in 1931 , Hitler said, in the Detroit News: » I think Henry Ford as an inspiration . «
The admiration was apparently mutual. In July 1938 , Henry Ford accepted a medal from the German government, the highest award that could be given to a foreigner by the Nazis. A month later , James Mooney, a senior executive of GM , also received a medal from the German government « for the great services rendered to the Reich . » The English writer Charles Higham Mooney quotes these words in 1940 : » Hitler is right , and I will not do anything that might upset him . «
The arsenal of Nazism
At the end of the war, Henry Schneider , an investigator from the U.S. Army, described the German subsidiary of Ford of » arsenal of Nazism , at least for military vehicles . » According to Schneider , this device had the approval of Ford executives , USA. Recognition of Nazis for Ford and GM was well founded : trucks « Blitz » , produced in a factory built by GM in Berlin , was a major component of » Blitzkrieg » , the German aggression against its neighboring countries : Poland, the USSR and France . Opel , the German subsidiary of GM , Ford and Germany were the first two truck manufacturers for the German military.
Without large capital investment by U.S. companies in the German economy , the army of the Reich in 1938 would never have been able to organize , or even think effectifs.L grow its invasion of Poland programmed with Russian communists would have remained as the dream state .
Without interventions Howard Bush , combined with those of the Harriman brothers and Rockefeller Zionist Wall Street bankers have left their hands in their pockets rather than going out hundreds of millions of dollars that the German economic machine needed to prowl its new weapons of war.
American capitalists chose to start a war to boost the economy bankrupt America … passing over the heads of the people itself!
The New World Order was planned and would bring big : U.S. unemployed will be recycled into soldiers …. mouths to feed food banks serve to flesh guns fatten the » battlefield » !
The past is the future, we should be wary of » current American capitalists » as well as the Zionist bankers who did not hesitate to lend vast sums to the Reich, they will not hesitate to initiate a Third World War in order to cash in quick profits , without regard for future consequences!
We are all self-defense !
Long Life to the Second American People Revolution !
[This is quite a treatise. Anthony is one of the best researched alternative financial analysts I’ve read and always brings new information and challenging ideas to the table. The Hitler controversy within the alternative community often gets pretty black and white which I don’t care for, there are too many factors as work.
We do know at the least he was used to bring about the restructuring of the geopolitical map, the inception of occult influenced fascist science, the rise of the UN, the further centralized control of the banksters, and the securing of a safe haven for Zionism. We also know the fascist Reich never ended but continued on unchecked unto today with its true big brother and financier, the fascist United States. (By the way, notice the infamous “dark” left eye in the photo, a trademark of sociopaths.) – Zen
There is the widespread notion that Hitler was fighting the Money Power and that he was a problem for the Bankers because he created a Usury free economy. But there was no Usury free Third Reich economy. The German taxpayer continued to pay interest over the substantial national debt and commercial banking received interest for its fractional re
serve banking based loans, which to a large extent financed the war.
“Our greatest social task is the abolition of interest slavery. This responsibility to abolish interest slavery towers above all other issues of the day. It is the only solution to the greatest problem of our time. The breaking of interest slavery is the most important moral imperative in social terms, it rises in its general significance far beyond all questions of the day, it is the solution of social questions, it is the only way out of the terrible confusion of the time. The abolition of interest slavery will deliver us from ultra-capitalist domination while avoiding both Communist destruction of the human spirit and Capitalist degradation of labour. The abolition of interest slavery opens the way to a truly social economy, by liberating us from the overwhelming domination of money. It opens the way to a state based on creative work and genuine accomplishment.” – Gottfried Feder 1919
Where does Hitler’s reputation for anti-Usury activism come from? It was more Nazi propaganda to get him to power than his actual policies after he did. It was not Hitler, but Gottfried Feder who was the anti-Usury man of the Nazi. Hitler in Mein Kampf: ” For the first time in my life I heard (through Feder, AM) a discussion which dealt with the principles of stock exchange capital and capital which was used for loan activities. After hearing the first lecture delivered by Feder, the idea immediately came into my head that I had found a way to one of the most essential prerequisites for the founding of a new party.
To my mind, Feder’s merit consisted in the ruthless and trenchant way in which he described the double character of the capital engaged in stock exchange and loan transactions, laying bare the fact that this capital is ever and always dependent on the payment of interest.” And:
“The struggle against international finance capital and loan capital has become one of the most important points in the program on which the German nation has based its fight for economic freedom and independence.”
Point 11 of the NSDAP 25 point program, a manifesto that officially (but not in practice) expressed Nazi policy: “Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery.”
Hitler put it this way: “Our financial principle: Finance shall exist for the benefit of the state; the financial magnates shall not form a state within the state. Hence our aim to break the thralldom of interest. Relief of the state, and hence of the nation, from its indebtedness to the great financial houses, which lend on interest. Nationalization of the Reichsbank and the issuing houses, which lend on interest.”
But as we shall see, Hitler did not implement any serious monetary reform after he came to power. He did make finance completely subservient to the State and, more specifically, rearmament. But he did not nationalize any banks and the Reichsbank was already nationalized by the Weimar Republic by the time he came to power. He did not end interest payments to ‘the issuing houses’, who must have made an uncanny fortune throughout the war. He did nothing to decouple the Stock Exchange from the economy.
Feder was made Secretary of State for Economic Affairs, but was from day one sabotaged by Reichsbank President Hjalmar Schacht and replaced by him in August 1934. It was Schacht who was to manage the Nazi economy, not Feder.
Schacht’s and Hitler’s policies allowed full control of the economy, which was used to maximize production for the sake of war. But it did absolutely nothing to limit in any way massive war profiteering by the financial and industrial classes that brought him to power.
The Reichsmark The Reichsmark was created 1924 after its predecessor, the Papiermark, had been inflated into oblivion. 1 Reichsmark was 1 Trillion Papiermark. The Reichsmark lasted until 1948, when it was replaced by the Deutsche Mark. So Hitler simply used the monetary system that he inherited from the Weimar Republic. The Reichsmark, like any other banking unit, was lent into circulation. It was a Gold backed unit until 1931, when the depression forced the Reichsbank (the Central Bank) to implement exchange controls, which effectively took Germany off the Gold Standard. A Gold peg remained in place. There were 1, 2 and 5 Reichsmark silver coins.
Hitler inherited the official Weimar 4,5% maximum interest rate. He ruled by decree, but never changed this. In fact, after the Nazi economy began to boom due to heavy spending on rearmament, it seems interest rates were raised to combat inflation. I’ve been unable to find any data on real interest rates during the Nazi era.
Who was Hjalmar Schacht? Schacht was born in 1934 as the son of an aristocratic family. He joined Dresdner Bank in 1903 and already in 1905 was meeting people like JP Morgan and Theodore Roosevelt. He studied Hebrew to advance his career. In 1908 he joined Freemasonry. He oversaw the financing of Belgian/German trade during WW1 and used his former employer Dresdner Bank for this. This blatant conflict of interest led to his dismissal, but the revolving door was not invented recently and he was taken back by Dresdner Bank after this.
In 1923 he joined the Reichsbank and played a key role in ending the hyperinflation of the day. A little later he was made President of the Reichsbank and remained in this post until 1930. Since at least 1923 he was actively resisting the war reparations that were destroying the German economy and called for resurrection of German power. In 1926 he became involved with the NSDAP and supported their rise to power, although he never became a member.
He oversaw the formation of I.G. Farben in the twenties.
Schacht was a member of the Keppler Circle, a small group of businessmen that were at the heart of the Nazi movement and which financed Hitler’s rise to power. Wall Street was very influential in this group and contrary to what many Hitler apologists claim, played a heavy role in both financing him and war profiteering.
Shortly after Hitler came to power he was reinstated as President of the Reichsbank and when he replaced Feder as Reichscommissar for the Economy, he basically gained full control over the economy. This lasted until he was fired in 1939, when the German economy was overheating and Schacht wanted to limit spending on rearmament and was accused of ‘mutiny’ by Hitler.
Banking in Nazi Germany before the war After becoming President of the Reichsbank, Schacht immediately started implementing policies aiming at giving the State full control of financial markets. This was known as ‘the New Plan’:
“(1) restriction of the demand for such foreign exchange as would be used for purposes unrelated to the conspirators’ rearmament program; (2) increase of the supply of foreign exchange, as a means of paying for essential imports which could not otherwise be acquired; and (3) clearing agreements and other devices obviating the need for foreign exchange. Under the “New Plan”, economic transactions between Germany and the outside world were no longer governed by the autonomous price mechanism; they were determined by a number of Government agencies whose primary aim was to satisfy the needs of the Nazi’s military economy.”
Foreign exchange controls were implemented to manage shortages in foreign currencies. Rules for credit creation by the Reichsbank were cancelled, aimed at potentially limitless credit creation to provide the economy with the liquidity it needed to get back at full employment.
All policies were aimed at 1) making sure the Government was basically the only borrower at domestic capital markets and 2) to make sure there was always enough credit available.
Price and wage controls and indeed rising interest rates were used to combat rising prices that would have resulted from these inflating policies.
Between 31 December and 30 June 1938, the national debt of the Reich rose from 10.4 billion Marks to 19 billion Marks.
There was no nationalization of banks. In fact: some banks that the Weimar republic had nationalized during the early days of the depression, were again privatized. Private banks played a crucial role in financing the rearmament effort. They were put under close Reichsbank control to make sure their lending was what the State wanted, but nothing was done to limit their profitability.
The Stock Exchange While railing against this typical exploitative instrument of finance during his rise to power, Hitler did nothing to limit the stock exchange’s scope and operations once he had the chance. The stock exchange system in the Reich was superficially reformed: a number of its outlets were merged and the number of exchanges declined from 25 to 9 as a result. But volume of trading was never threatened and during the early Hitler years it saw annual double digit rises until 1937, when the Reich’s economy started faltering and the stock exchange lost about 10% of its capitalization between 1937 and 1939. After the war broke out the stock market saw a massive boom, rising 50% between the falls 1939 and 1941.
In 1934 heavy taxes were levied on dividend payments of 6%, but the aim of this was not to limit profiteering, but to enhance self-financing of publicly traded corporations. They were expected to recycle more of their profits into their own operations, to make them independent of capital markets, which the State intended and managed to completely dominate for its own financing needs. There were loopholes to evade this measure and shareholders were not damaged because of these measures, as it implied deferment of dividend payments and not real limitations.
The Reich’s policies also made sure the common man did not enter the stock market, as they were expected to lend to the Government and not to speculate. But still, the amount of funds being diverted to the stock market were not invested in the war and “It was then (1942, AM) that the government stepped in and destroyed the last relatively free market in the economy. Loans for the purchase of stocks were prohibited. Shareholders had to file a declaration with the government of all shares purchased since the outbreak of war if their market value exceeded 100,000 Reichsmark. The government could, at any time, request that any of these shares be delivered to it for cash and that the proceeds be invested in securities to be specified by the government. (Nathan)”
MEFO While every effort was made to assure the State’s domination of capital markets, there was simply not enough liquidity in the economy to create full employment and unlock the German Folk’s full productive capacity for rearmament. This could have been solved by having the State go massively into debt, in typical Keynesian fashion. But this would have created both political and economic problems and, equally important, would have shown the full extent of rearmament to the Reich’s enemies.
Instead, Hitler, right after coming to power, fired Reichsbank President Hans Luther and reinstated Hjalmar Schacht, who was willing to build on Luther’s Oeffa’s: Government promissory notes aimed at creating employment that would create the extra liquidity needed to finance Hitler’s plans.
Schacht created a special purpose vehicle (SPV, a dummy corporation) called MEtallurgische FOrschungsgesellschaft (MEFO), which was used to accept bills of exchange drawn by German weapons manufacturers and received by all German banks for possible re-discounting by the Reichsbank. The bills were guaranteed by the Reich for five years and were thus (indirectly) convertible to Reichsmark.
MEFO bills of exchange were a pure bookkeeping operation and there were no actual paper certificates. They circulated between MEFO, the Reichsbank, commercial banks and manufacturers, not in the wider economy. At its peak there were about 12 billion worth in circulation. Key was that they were kept off the Reich’s books as all transactions were logged at the MEFO SPV. Because of this, nobody really knew the extent of spending on weaponry.
While they solved the depression and allowed for the Nazi war machine, they also created fairly serious inflationary pressures. And while this kind of construct may sound ‘innovative’ to the uninitiated, they would have been a no brainer for an experienced banker like Schacht. As said, they were based on certificates (called Oeffa) that the Weimar Republic was already circulating and national treasuries had been circulating their own certificates routinely, when pressing political issues forced them to increase their financial clout. The US Treasury had its Treasury notes before the Civil War. The UK printed ‘Bradbury Pounds’ (debt free notes) to finance WW1. The Canadian Treasury printed its own debt free money as of 1935 and during the twenties and thirties advanced monetary reform programs were widely discussed throughout the West.
Conclusion Hitler was heavily indebted to Feder’s anti-Usury stance in coming to power. But early on during his reign he got rid of Feder and relied on Schacht for the financing of his war plans. Unlike Schacht, Feder was not heavily involved with the top bankers and industrialists of the age. The German economy was directed completely to rearmament. Consumption levels were kept low through taxation and wage controls. Imports and production of luxuries were severely restricted.
Schacht made sure the financial industry was focused solely on war preparation and in effect allowed only the State to borrow on the domestic capital markets. International trade was primarily reliant on (scarce) foreign currencies and while there was some international bartering, it was far from dominant. The Reich’s financial industry did not decouple entirely from international finance, although foreign exchange controls were strict. For instance: the Bank of International Settlements continued dealings with the Reich.
There was no usury free economy. The common man or small business actually would have next to no access to credit at all. Even manufacturers were forced to become self financing, so the State could monopolize borrowing on the capital markets. The stock market boomed like never before.
Instead, all policies were directed at securing sufficient funds for rearmament, not at minimizing financial exploitation by the parasitical class that Hitler so vehemently attacked with his rhetoric. Finance was a matter of volume, not cost. Schacht’s MEFO bills have been wrongly jumped upon to claim Hitler was an anti banker man, while Schacht himself has the typical bio of a high level Money Power operative. He was a life long friend of BoE chief Montague Norman and was acquitted at Neurenberg, where the Soviets wanted a conviction while the British made sure he was released.
The myth of Nazi anti-Usury activism is damaging, not only because of its mythological character, but because it allows the Money Power to defame anti-Usury activism through ‘guilt by association’. In fact, many Austrians and Mainstreamers, call usury-free monetary reform programs ‘fascist’. Fascism itself is being rehabilitated because of its supposed stance against finance capitalism. But as we have learned from Bolton’s ‘The Banking Swindle’, the twenties and thirties saw many monetary reform programs throughout the West, far from all associated with fascism. After the war they were relegated to a memory hole because of this false association with fascism.
War profiteering by the industrial and financial class was in no way restricted. As a result, they profited immensely from the war. This was indeed the main reason for them to enable Hitler’s rise to power and their loyal support of his policies during the rearmament and the war. Even today, the main culprits like the Thyssen family, Krupp and the Goebbels step-children owning BMW are among the richest people in Germany. The same banks that financed the Reich’s war are now among the biggest in the world.
(with special thanks to Niels Verduijn and Ad Broere)
Afterthought 1 Let me be the first to admit I, until recently, believed much of what was said about Hitler’s ‘usury-free’ economy and have inadvertently contributed to the harnessing of this meme.
Afterthought 2 I agree with much of revisionist history. Post war historiography is just wartime propaganda. The Holocaust needs serious revaluation. Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill were psychopaths who committed horrible crimes, against the Japanese, their own people, the people the colonized and against the Germans.
I do feel that at this point many in the Alternative Media go overboard, making Hitler a hero. This is unwarranted. The current article shows, in spite of what many believe, he was far from a renegade in a financial sense. There is also the Hunger Plan: Hitler and the Wehrmacht High Command intended to have the Wehrmacht live of the Russian land they were to occupy by robbing the farmers of their harvests. They cynically calculated this would starve 30 million Russians. Thankfully they never had the chance to fully implement this, but still millions of Russians starved because of the Wehrmacht taking their supplies.
The fact is that Hitler always wanted to invade Russia and his explanation that it was to save the world of Marxism, which he well analyzed to be a Jewish front, is irreconcilable with his take that Britain was a nation of Aryan brothers and the British Empire ‘necessary’ and a great civilizing force in the world: even at that time it was well known that the British Aristocracy had merged with Jewish Money and that the City of London was the Money Power’s capital.
Hitler was an imperialist who wanted to conquer Russia for the third Reich and intended to kill untold millions of Russians to take their land. His rise and fall gave the Money Power everything it wanted, including the war itself, the Zionist Entity in Palestine, the EU, Soviet domination of Eastern Europe, the destruction of the British Empire, the UN and the Cold War.
We will probably never know whether he was a useful idiot or willing stooge, but while he may have been no worse than his antagonists, he certainly also was no better.
(Sources:Hitler and the Bankster ,Ingrid Rimland,personnal researches)
Bienvenue à tous et à toutes:Nous venons de lancer une nouvelle boutique indépendante du site afin de nous aider à rentabiliser notre site Michelduchaine.com
Vous trouverez de nombreux articles vintage et de collection diverses au fil des jours.
Elle vous permettra d'acquérir des articles venant directement de Michel...D'aille elle s'appelle "Vintage par Michel que vous trouverez sur ce lien:https://www.etsy.com/ca-fr/shop/VintageParMichel?ref=seller-platform-mcnav Ignorer