CONFIRMED: US Claims Against Syria – There is no Evidence

The Wall Street Journal has confirmed what many suspected, that the West’s so-called “evidence” of the latest alleged “chemical attacks” in Syria, pinned on the Syrian government are fabrications spun up from the West’s own dubious intelligence agencies.

cialogoThe Wall Street Journal reveals that the US is citing claims from Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency fed to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), a repeat of the fabrications that led up to the Iraq War, the Libyan War, and have been used now for 3 years to justify continued support of extremists operating within and along Syria’s borders.

Wall Street Journal’s article, “U.S., Allies Prepare to Act as Syria Intelligence Mounts,” states:

One crucial piece of the emerging case came from Israeli spy services, which provided the Central Intelligence Agency with intelligence from inside an elite special Syrian unit that oversees Mr. Assad’s chemical weapons, Arab diplomats said. The intelligence, which the CIA was able to verify, showed that certain types of chemical weapons were moved in advance to the same Damascus suburbs where the attack allegedly took place a week ago, Arab diplomats said.

Both Mossad and the CIA are clearly compromised in terms of objectivity and legitimacy. Neither exists nor is expected to provide impartial evidence, but rather to facilitate by all means necessary the self-serving agendas, interests, and objectives of their respective governments.

That both Israel and the United States, as far back as 2007 have openly conspired together to overthrow the government of Syria through a carefully engineered sectarian bloodbath, discredits entirely their respective intelligence agencies. This is precisely why an impartial, objective third-party investigation has been called for by the international community and agreed upon by the Syrian government – a third-party investigation the US has now urged to be canceled ahead of its planned military strikes.

The Wall Street Journal reports:

In an email on Sunday, White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice told U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power and other top officials that the U.N. mission was pointless because the chemical weapons evidence already was conclusive, officials said. The U.S. privately urged the U.N. to pull the inspectors out, setting the stage for President Barack Obama to possibly move forward with a military response, officials said.

The US then, not Syria, is attempting a coverup, with fabrications in place from discredited, compromised intelligence sources and the threat of impending military strikes that would endanger the UN inspection team’s safety should they fail to end their investigation and withdraw.

The Wall Street Journal also reiterated that the US is planning to fully sidestep the UN Security Council and proceed with its partners unilaterally:

…if the U.S. chose to strike, it would do so with allies and without the U.N., in order to sidestep an expected Russian veto.

The US proceeds now with absolute disregard for international law, all but declaring it has no intention of providing credible evidence of its accusations against the Syrian government. It is a rush to war with all the hallmarks of dangerous desperation as the West’s proxy forces collapse before the Syrian military. Western military leaders must consider the strategic tenants and historical examples regarding the dangers and folly of haste and imprudence in war – especially war fought to protect special interests and political agendas rather than to defend territory.

The populations of the West must likewise consider what benefits they have garnered from the last decade of military conquest their leaders have indulged in. Crumbling economies gutted to feed the preservation of special interests and the growing domestic security apparatuses to keep these interests safe from both domestic and foreign dissent are problems that will only grow more acute.

Outside of the West, in Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran, leaders must consider a future where Western special interests can invade with impunity, without public support, or even the tenuous semblance of justification being necessary.

Scoop urgent : une communication interceptée entre Laurent Fabius et le secrétaire du Président Assad (PSDT (pro Assad))

Laurent Fabius,un apôtre de  la politique ringarde de l'ancienne gauche caviard française
Laurent Fabius,un apôtre de la politique ringarde de l’ancienne gauche « caviard » française

CONTENU D UN ENTRETIEN TELEPHONIQUE entre Mr Laurent Fabius ( L) et Le Secrétaire (S) Général du Psdt Assad,il y a très peu de temps:
L. : Nous avons toutes les informations même avant la fin de l enquête de l ONU de laquelle on s en fiche, que c est Mr Assad qui a lancé des armes chimiques à Al Ghoutta.
S. : Le Président Assad n a pas lancé ces armes mais bien les mercenaires dits rebelles d après votre jargon-fantasme.
L. : J entends bien que ce n est pas lui en chair et en os mais c est l Armée de Bachar.
S. : Ce n est pas l armée de Bachar, c est l Armée de la République Arabe Syrienne.
L. :J entends bien, c est l Armée de Mr Assad.
S. : Chez vous, vous ne dites pas :L armée de François. Pour nous, l armée de la RAS n a pas lancé ces armes.
L. : J entends bien que l Armée a lancé ces armes. J ai bingophoné avec le Psdt du CNS qui m a dit que l armée de la RAS est responsable.
S. :Mais ce témoin n est pas expert en armes chimiques. Il a été emprisonné en Syrie il y a belle lurette pour trafic d armes et de drogues.
L. :J entends bien mais Abdul Rahman de l OSDH m a fait aussi la même confirmation mais un nombre de 300. ça fait deux témoins plausibles contre Mr Assad.
S.: Lui, il est vendeur de Schaworma.
L.: J entends bien mais pourquoi Mr Assad nie l implication de son Gvt?
S. : Parce qu il dit la vérité. Nous n avons aucun intérêt de lancer des armes chimiques bien au contraire.
L. : Mais il est tenace votre Psdt, ça m ennuie car j ai décidé que c est lui et il qu il est fautif mais il ne veut pas accepter de faire ce que je voulais qu il fasse. C est un monde quand même.
S. : Mr L.F., nous sommes en 2013 et non pas avant 1945 quand la Syrie était un « protectorat » français.
L. : Nous savons de quoi le peuple syrien a besoin et nous vous le produisons dans nos laboratoires….zut …il m a raccroché au nez…


Pendant ce temps ,à Damas une foule acclame son président méprisé par le Nouvel Ordre Mondial...parce qu'il  veut rester souverain.
Pendant ce temps ,à Damas une foule acclame son président méprisé par le Nouvel Ordre Mondial…parce qu’il veut rester souverain.


Juste une petite question: pourquoi y a-t-il un front de solidarité européen de former four soutenir la Syrie? C'est parce que les gens sont mieux informé qu'avant!
Juste une petite question: pourquoi y a-t-il un front de solidarité européen de former four soutenir la Syrie?
C’est parce que les gens sont mieux informé qu’avant!